Government has not send rep disclosed
such convention but I. Hanstaux, any quoting
Section #5. Subsection 1. 6. of the arding
the contends that clause Section 5 by
that subsection does not Sto French
lord's
apily
or other foreign ships which have been properly inspected country.
danhauled in their own
It seems to me that there is good clear to be said for this view of the Board of Trade wish us to ascertain
1
I do not know if it is sound
whose opinion is to be final on the subject but we had better send the whole correspondence to the colony & have When Attorney General's
's new.
C.PL
24. Nov.
The decision the ther
has survey
my Foreign Steamship
and other certificates sufficient
to exempt it from survey under section 5
it from survey regulation Ainame of the Merchant Shipping
1891 where decision is final
with the Governor in Council - (see subs. (1)(b)) - in the case of the "Hanoi" where these papers state that the Agents of the Ship's Master that the ship applied for a survey other than for the purpose of obtaining a certificate.
Page 363
if it was a mistake, of treating the ship as liable to survey under section 5 would appear to have originated with the ship's agents and this should be pointed out to C.O. But before we write to the Colony again, I would ask the Board of Trade whether the
J would recommend any and what amend
any section 5(1)(b) of the Hong Kong Ordinance so as to define more clearly what certificate for the purposes of a foreign ship should exempt the ship from survey in the Colony.
theme t, 363 of the Merchant Shipping log4)
and also whether the Ordinance should not provide for the issue by the Atty Gen. to ships exempted from survey under section 5(1)(a) and (b) certificates having the same effect as certificates issued after survey under subsection (1c) of the same section 5
alonu
Ew 1200
Page 363
Page 363
Government has not send rep disclosed
such convention but I. Hanstaux, any quoting
Section #5. Subsection 1. 6. of the arding
the contends that clause Section 5 by
that subsection does not Sto Freuch
lord's
apily
or other foreign ships which have been properly inspected country.
danhauled in their own
It seems to me that there is good Clear to be said for this view of thre Board & Trade wish us to ascertain
1
I do not know If it is sound
whose opinion is to be final on the suljet but we had better send the whole corespondence to the colony & have When Attorney General's
''s new.
C.PL
24. Nov.
The decision the ther
has survey
my Foreign Steamshif
and other cortificates sufficicat
to exempt it pom survey under section 5
it fem survey restedation Ainame of the Merchant Shipping
1891 where decision is phal
weto with the Gevorner in Council - (see subs. (1)(b)) - in the case of the "Hanoi" waheel these pupers wher it is stated that they of the Starbror Master that the Agents other thif applied for a survey other ship for the purpose of obtaining a pupenes.
anche pecté under the Adinand
the
597
if it was a mistake, of treating the shif as liable to survey under section 5 would appear to have originated with the ship's quits and this should be pointed out to 7.0. But befne as write to the Colony ortão. I would ask the B Trade whether the
- heat
J would recommend any and y any what amend -
jany section 5 (1)(b) of the Hong Kang adinance so as to define more clearly what calificate purposed of a freeeps ship sheuld Seempt the ship prom surory in the Colong (черный)
theme t, 363 of the Merchant Shipping log4)
and also whether the adinance should not provide for the iqme the Almil Gr. to ships sxempted from survey und
hals wit 5 (1) (a) and (b) cortificates having the same effect as certificates issued after survey
under subrection (10) of the same reviin 5
alonu
Ew 1200
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.